New Housing Tailored for Communities

From the Rotherham Star

New housing tailored for communities

Rotherham adopts pandering pragmatic approach

By Ray Parkin

NEW houses built in Rotherham could be specially designed to cater for the growing minority ethnic community.

Council bosses are concerned that most new developments are built to a standard pattern and don’t take different cultures into account. Now they hope to persuade builders planning new developments in areas with large black and minority ethnic populations to consult with local residents first. The council says homes could then be designed differently to take into consideration the way people from different cultures live their lives.
That could mean bigger kitchens for communal eating, more privacy for women, greater security, no letter boxes and even provision for a barbecue – a social ritual for some ethnic groups. (Australians?) Colour schemes and window shapes could even differ to take into account different traditions.

There is no official legislation which can force house builders to make special provision. Instead builders must be persuaded to take local needs into account when planning new developments.

A report to the council’s Cabinet says: “Housing developers must ensure they are not directly or indirectly creating barriers to any of Rotherham’s communities.
“Rotherham is made up of communities each of which has its own unique identity, population and needs. Housing developers must be informed and fully equipped with information about the area they are working in”.

“Rotherham has a diverse community with people from many different backgrounds. As well as established communities there are newly (?) communities of people who have settled here. With such a diverse community comes a variety of needs, which must be considered in plans to create housing.”

The council says a recent decision to press for more affordable housing in new housing schemes is an opportunity to take the needs of the minority ethnic communities into consideration.

Or to put it another way, if you are a white indigenous Briton, you don’t count anymore.

Call to link services to vote for migrants

Rotherham MP Denis MacShane says special hotlines in Romani and other languages should be set up to make migrants more aware of the need to be on the register.

The hotlines would also help children being trafficked to escape from gangmasters and pimps who are exploiting them.

Speaking in the House of Commons debate Mr MacShane said the Government should also set up more refuges for sex slave children who want to quit their controllers.
He is also calling for forced marriages to be made a crime and for a tougher stance on deportation.

The MP says the Home Office should provide accurate data on underage prostitution after studies from the Netherlands showed 15 percent of trafficked sex slaves were under the age of 18.
He said “Figures on trafficked girls in Britain are notoriously unreliable. But if we accept the Home Office figure of around 4000 trafficked women at any one time and assume that the Dutch comparison is valid for us, that means an estimated 600 girls who should be at school are working as sex slaves to pleasure British men in exchange for money.”

“There are serious problems with Roma communities all over the UK”

“Concerns have been expressed by my own councillor colleagues in Rotherham and one way to deal with them would be to insist, for example that all European Union citizens should be on the electoral register before having access to any public services.”
“If they want to put their kids in school or draw child benefit, to register with a GP or to have treatment in hospital or to use any public service they should be on the register.”

“I would make that a new British law, combining access to public service with the responsibility of having the vote.” (as long as they vote Labour of course)

This nu liebour fool sickens me and should sicken any decent person with half a brain. He wants hotlines to help immigrants get on the electoral register. Many of these people have been in the country for all of five minutes, can’t speak the language, have no awareness whatsoever of British culture, history or politics and he wants to give them ‘the responsibility of having the vote’. It’s fairly obvious why and who he hopes they’ll vote for and they probably will, in gratitude for Labours largesse in allowing them into the land of milk and honey in the first place. The hotlines would also supposedly help trafficked children escape from gangmasters and pimps who exploit them, (that’s always assuming, as this dimwit apparently does, that the pimps and gangmasters will allow them unsupervised access to a telephone).

Well, this pushes all the right emotional buttons for the kind-hearted British people, but he does of course neglect to mention that if not for his governments past and ongoing indiscriminate open/no borders policy we wouldn’t actually have any trafficked children or any gangmasters and pimps exploiting them in the first place.

As for the rest of it i.e. criminalising forced marriage and taking a tougher stance on deportation etc, I’ll believe it when I see it, Labour have been making these kinds of noises for years as every so often they feel the need to talk tough and con the indigenous Brits that they actually give a damn what we think, but nothing ever actually happens. The truth is of course that they can't take a tougher stance on deportation because the EU and its human rights legislation won't let them and they still want to give even more power to Brussels.

The problem of trafficked women and the people who exploit them is an issue for the police, it’s their job to investigate, find out who these criminals are and arrest them. Then when found guilty they are either jailed or deported. The Government could of course help the police out considerably by being a bit more discerning about who they let into the country in the first place, but I don't suppose there's much chance of that happening.

Linking services to the vote for migrants is a completely bogus issue; unless that is your real agenda is gaining immigrant votes for the Labour party. He says “If they want to put their kids in school or draw child benefit, to register with a GP or to have treatment in hospital or to use any public service they should be on the register.”

I wonder how many of these trafficked women or girls have kids that they want to put through school, I must confess that I know little about these things but it seems probable to me that children would perhaps be, to put it mildly, rather frowned upon by the ‘pimps and gangmasters’ and would be viewed as an unnecessary encumbrance.

Or perhaps he’s talking about the ‘pimps and gangmasters’ themselves. Do we really want these people to have the vote in our country? Do we actually want them in our country at all? I think not.

That aside, I’m assuming that these criminals are not exploiting women as a hobby and do it for the money which I imagine is considerable, in which case they have no need of benefits and as far as doctors and schools go etc they’re going to do what many of the Labour MP’s do and go private which would enable them to stay under the radar, which after all, is how criminals best do business.

Is this is the classic ploy? Create a problem and then when you think the time is right, propose a solution and come out smelling of roses, possibly, or it could be he’s just an opportunistic vote whoring parasite of a career politician who doesn’t give a damn who votes for him as long as he stays on the gravy train.

On the other hand of course, taking the charitable view, it’s possible that he’s just an idiot!

I leave you to decide. But whatever you determine his motives are, this man and his ilk have no place in government.

Going back to Denis’s idea, in fairness, it is indeed a solution of sorts, but not such much to the problems of immigrants or trafficked children, but to Labours falling share of the vote among the indigenous British population whom they have obviously abandoned.

Finally, I’m also left wondering who’s going to pay for all these multilingual hotlines and refuges.

Bet it isn’t Denis.

I’d just like to add that Denis MacShane treasonously voted, along with many of his colleagues, to deny the British People the opportunity to have a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty/Constitution which will give effective control of this country to the unelected commissioners of the EU. This is despite the Labour Party’s election promise that there would be no constitution without a referendum.

This is Denis’s idea of democracy.

Marketing Multiculturalism

This item I borrowed from ‘The Home of the Green Arrow’ blog and I’m sure he won’t mind one bit as the more people get to read it the better. It concerns how we are manipulated by the media to believe certain things and how entertainment is used subtly and sometimes blatantly to further the multicultural agenda. If you were not aware of this happening then read on and become enlightened. I reproduce the article in full below.

From The Home of the Green Arrow

Well as regular readers of this site know, I am always looking for others to submit articles and we have been lucky in having some really good work submitted to us by Najistani.

But I am really excited this evening at being able to introduce you to a truly excellent new writer whose pen-name is, Sarah: Maid of Albion.

Sarah, is a Lady, that like all True Brits loves her country, our county and now deeply regrets the fact that she voted for New Labour in the last three elections. Sarah is now a confirmed British National Party supporter. This is her first article for The Home of The Green Arrow. Rest assured I will not allow it to be her last.

Marketing Multiculturalism

Subliminal advertising, whereby a message appears on a TV or movie screen for a fleeting instant, too quick for the eye to see, but long enough for it to register on the subconscious, has long been banned in the UK. However, there are many similar tricks used by Marketing and advertising firms to subliminally plant an unspoken message in the subconscious mind of an unwary audience. This seldom more the case than with those in the business of promoting multiculturalism.

We have all long grown used to the TV shows and dramas which show a parallel universe beset by high levels of white crime and innocent ethnic victim-hood. American TV is perhaps the worst, indeed some of the cop shows are hardly worth watching, because you know from the outset that the villain will be the handsome white guy. Admittedly, sometimes they will play with us for the first two acts and allow us to believe that a black character might be guilty, however, you can guarantee that by part three he will be exposed as the innocent patsy of the “real” (meaning white) criminal.

Those who do not wish to have “Law and Order” and “CSI Vegas” ruined for them, should skip this paragraph, but there are various formulas to which the US shows almost always comply, as if the screen writers' guild have issued a set of rules which any studio producing a US cop show is obliged to follow.

Rule One: Whatever the story, a handsome rich white male will be revealed as an unpleasant person at some point.

Rule two: a black male will never guilty be of a serious crime unless

• a) he was led into the crime by a much more morally reprehensible white character,
• b) he committed the crime to pay for his dying daughter's/mother's/grandfather's urgent cancer surgery (or for an equivalent benevolent motive) or
• c) the cop is black.

Rule three: White women are only guilty if

• a) they smoke,
• b) they smoke and the victim is black or female
• c) they are rich and smoke.

Rule four: Black women are never guilty of anything, ever.

Similar rules, together with the “include as many jolly black faces and presenters as possible in every scene” rule are followed in the UK in respect of the TV, Internet and magazine propaganda aimed at our children. However, when marketing multiculturalism to British grown ups the media reluctantly accepts that they are selling their product to a more sophisticated audience than than is generally the case in middle America, and this requires them to take a slightly more subtle approach.

The techniques used by the UK media in hyping “diversity” are less transparent than those used in America, but they are no less dishonest. One of the perhaps less subtle of these techniques is what one might call “racial proportionality weighting”, in this respect it is occasionally possible for an ethnic minority character in a soap opera or drama to be guilty of a crime or even, very occasionally, not be a very nice person. However, this must be offset by greater levels of white guilt and white unpleasantness and accompanied some biting reference to social (i.e. Black) deprivation. In addition any show which includes a guilty or unpleasant person of ethnic minority must also include an equal, or preferably greater, number of honest, upstanding, likeable and altogether admirable characters of similar ethnic heritage.

The racial proportionality technique is a more subtle form of the infamous “tiny minority” lie, which is regularly used, with varying degrees of success, when discussing extremism within the Islamic community.

Another and progressively more frequent technique is the use of the very white black man, that is to say, the employment of actors who look black but act white, just a little sexier. For most actors, acting is a precarious profession, often involving long periods of unemployment, however, this is not so for that small, select, group of clean cut black actors who look good in a blazer, they are never out of work. Such actors are usually presented as action heroes, generally brighter and more athletic/competent than their white counterparts and will invariably end up in a passionate clinch with the beautiful (white) heroine.

This is such a common device that I think many of us would be challenged were we asked to name a recent prime time TV drama or Soap opera which did not have one of the very white men as a central and active cast member. (Do not be fooled by Lenny Henry, ethnic characters are hugely over represented on UK TV, even in costume dramas where Victorian London is often portrayed as almost as racially mixed as modern day Croydon)

We all know that in real life such very white black men would not survive five minutes if their Range Rover broke down in Peckham, and that they probably think gang culture is something grown in a petrie dish, but Hey in the world of multicultural marketing he represents his race, and he ain't changed much since Sidney Poitier came to dinner.

The very white black man is also used, sadly with a lot of success, in the ongoing promotion of interracial sex which has has had such a damaging effect on the lives of so many young white girls, who have led to believe that the very white black man is representative of the majority of black males. However, that is a much larger and more serious issue which I will not address here.

Of the many other techniques used, the last I will focus on here is perhaps as close to subliminal advertising as it is possible to get. It is the use of the unspoken visual message, whereby the images chosen, and the manner in which they are presented, convey a subtle message designed to produce a response or stimulate an opinion on the part of the view.

An excellent example of the is the trailer for the forthcoming BBC series “White”, which supposedly deals with the experience of working class whites in modern Britain. In the trailer all we see is the head of a white male which gradually seems to disappear as words in various different foreign languages and dialects are written across his face. The image and the subject have been carefully chosen and manipulated in order to convey a subliminal message, in addition to the official one. It is clear that the BBC had no intention of presenting whiteness as being an attractive condition, and this is reflected in the choice of model who, with all due respect to the gentleman himself, is singularly unattractive. He is middle aged, he is overweight, he looks unfit, he is balding and he has a face which even a mother would struggle to love. The fact that Britain has produced some of the most famously handsome and attractive men from Carry Grant to Jude Law and David Beckham is ignored, and instead the white British male is presented as a semi obese slob.

Can we doubt for one moment that had the subject been the black community we would have been presented with either a smouldering dude or a beaming jolly Bob Marley look-a-like, or had it been the Asian community we would instead see a dark eyed, sari clad, lovely.

However, it is not just the choice of image, the manner in which it has been presented has also been deliberately manipulated to make whiteness appear even less appealing. The colour saturation has been reduced to the point where it is almost, but not quite, shot in black and white, this, as intended, presents an impression which is bleak, grim and... lacking in .er... colour (you get the message?). The image and, as such, the race is presented as something unappealing, unsatisfactory, incomplete and certainly not something the viewer would aspire to be part of. Can you, for one second, imagine that any other race would be presented in this way?

Were “White” to be instead another hymn to Multiculturalism, you can be assured that vivid and bright colours would be lavishly employed in order to remind the audience that, despite what they see around them, diversity is really a lot of fun.

From the clips we have seen of the series so far it seems that the same harsh, bleak, low saturation filming technique has been used, again presenting white Britain as somewhere nobody would wish to be, and, to stress the point we are promised that one of the programmes “White girl” will follow a young white girl as she escapes from her bleak existence in order to find solace in the warm and enlightened embrace of Islam.

From what we have seen of the “White” series, I am in little doubt that we can expect more of the anti white propaganda with which we are assailed both frontally and subliminally on a daily basis.


Sarah: Maid Of Albion

This Dreadful Government! The Devil Rides Out!

Please read this and pay careful attention as this is the truth about what is happening in Britain today. Guy Leven Torres as I have said before is not a member of the BNP but a member of UKIP and an intelligent and well educated man not given to lying or making up conspiracy theories. If you don’t know what ‘Common Purpose’ is then please Google ‘Brian Gerrish’ or ‘Common Purpose’ and find out for yourself. You will be shocked and not a little frightened.

If you care at all about what lies in store for us, our children and future generations of Britons you need to know about it. You also need to start fully supporting the British National Party while there is still time.

This Dreadful Government! The Devil Rides Out!

Guy Leven-Torres


3rd March 2008



In the light of the DVD sent to me by Brian Gerrish I am reissuing an article I wrote last November. The video sent presented an excellent expose of Common Purpose. So incredible is the truth presented with full evidence by Brian that I watched it no less than four times to satisfy myself I had the full facts and I was not dreaming. It should be compulsive viewing for every British citizen.



Brian described ‘Common Purpose’ as Evil. I would endorse that with the epithet Demonic and Satanic, run as it is by crooks, perverts and thieves hell bent on ruining this country and our civilisation. ‘Common Purpose’ it is clear is the real de facto Government of Britain, and the current New Labour front is a huge hoax as are the two other parties, Tory and Liberal. All are one Party, funded and taking orders from the Germans. I have even been told that German politicians simply refer to the EU as ‘Der Reich’.



1.25 million Britons died defending Europe against the Hitlerites and now it seems we are being conquered by them. I honestly do now believe, that only a popular uprising will win our country back or a well planned military coup by concerned patriotic British officers. Many of these, like their police colleagues are involved with ‘Common Purpose’ and the rot and corruption of our national civil and military institutions is so far advanced to make such an event, as a military takeover almost impossible. Treason has been committed and we are now occupied by a foreign Fascist regime.



Even more horrifying is the concentration by the CP cult on getting children to join its cultic indoctrination courses. Brian has established good evidence of connections with paedophiles and major criminals. A number of senior police officers, including Blair the Metropolitan chief are CP ‘Graduates’. What kind of ‘graduates’ we wonder of course- courses in perversion and fraud, drugs, terrorism, state control, theft of private property, extortion, laundering and misappropriation of public funds – it is all in the portfolio.



It appears both Brown and Prescott are CP ‘graduates’ and Cameron is said to have connections as does, former PM Blair. The Guardian revealed last year that Heath was a spy for the German DVD and it appears this has funded Common Purpose through the Deutsche Bank. I think once the Reform Treaty goes through, all hell will break loose and a resentful sullen British populace shocked when the full scale of betrayal becomes fully known, will react badly. It remains to be seen if the Army, or what is left of it and the lower ranks of the Police will fall behind the public resistance or whether they will obey the orders of their German masters and open fire on fellow Britons. I am sure blood will flow unfortunately.



It is clear to us now that Arch fool Rowan’s call for Sharia and the fact that Police too are being taught about Sharia law and the Koran, that the Government intend to use the extremists to further consolidate their power over us and deprive us of what is left of our ancient freedoms. The Moslems will become the scapegoats of course like the Jews in Nazi Germany. These in the main are simply dupes of the real power brokers mentioned above. In Britain why is it that one small section of perhaps 2-3 percent of the populace are being given so much assistance and help to Islamise the country? The thugs in power know this will antagonise the British Working Class. And in the resultant civil commotion that is about to ensue, the State will consolidate its rigid Stalinist grip through powers of National Emergency that already exist simply on the whim of a Minister……



I really do fear for the future in the next few months and year…



Original article updated....



I do not think in 54 years of life I have ever seen such a disgraceful Government as the current New Labour one we are having to suffer at this moment. Apart from the level of stupidity and downright incompetence, its venality, lies and arrogance beggar belief. In a way though I am pleased, because now we can see New Labour and its dark designs upon the country in the full glare of day and this may well be the saving of the nation from a group of conniving traitorous despots, determined to hand us over to a foreign Communist State in the making in Brussels and that now openly acts against its own people.



Indeed such a Government only twenty years ago would certainly, have been under consideration by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II for lawful dissolution and I believe we are now facing the gravest, constitutional crisis of the era, not dissimilar to the situation in 1974, when it was felt by the powers of the day that the corrupt Wilson administration faced the very real possibility of a military takeover ordered by the Queen on the advice of her Privy Council to prevent Wilson, thought to be giving us over to the USSR. In the event, Wilson was possibly planning to hand us over to the United States as the written records of the time released under the thirty year rule demonstrate. And even the USA is a better option than a Marxist super state in the form of the European Union. The USA at least is historically the same culture as Britain and shares a code of Common Law and language.



However, today this present Socialist Government drifts further to the Left everyday and now does not even bother to disguise the fact of its skulduggery. We are swamped by 5,000,000 migrants and probably more, illegal and legal, our intentions to travel and move about our own country are now under threat, and even our thoughts, that one would have believed immune until one actually commits an act, are now scrutinised and a situation now exists where an individual can be locked up for thinking the thoughts that the Government do not approve of! That situation only ever existed in states like the Soviet Russian and Nazi German and even more frightening is the willingness of the younger generation, even my own middle-aged one to accept it almost gladly.



Rousseau stated that when a Government acted against the interests of the people, the Social Contract between it and the populace was voided. I believe this situation to have come about within three years of New Labour’s election to power in 1997. It was certainly void the moment Blair and his cronies tried to limit freedom of speech through hate law legislation demanded by Moslems in Britain, making it an offence to criticise Islam as this single, thankfully foiled attempt showed illegal bias in favour of what represents, perhaps 1.5 percent of the population. The gerrymandering of election boundaries within Labour’s heartlands favouring the ethnic and migrant vote was also a dubious piece of social engineering that should have sent alarm bells ringing throughout the country.

As for the various criminal inquiries over bribes, election funds, falsified statistics, refusal to consider Parliament, almost certainly illegal wars in Iraq (not so much the fact but the false intent), and the disgraceful repeal of the Treason Acts and other legislation slipped through a docile legislature, including the totally unnecessary dissolution of the Privy Council, any one of these of their own accord would have called into question the legality of a past Government acting in such a deceitful manner.



Personally speaking, never a day goes by without a feeling of powerlessness and absolute disgust when reading of the latest activity of this Brown Executive that is in very real terms and even legal, now an Enemy of the British People. The Tories are no better and I was shocked to see UKIP names within Common Purpose letters. I just pray the rank and file like me are aware.



What a state of moral affairs! Homosexual couples given preference in tax and adoption schemes, young children made to attend lessons on the latter and being taught about sex and drugs as young as three years old, parents not being informed about the sexual activities of their underage children, filth and pornography permeates our TV screens.



On the cultural platform, foreign beliefs and celebrations are now superior to our own: Christmas, Easter, Guy Fawkes are banned under ‘Ealf an’ Safety’ or because it offends against the EU inspired legislation requiring ‘Equality and Diversity’ programs, children singing carols banned from shopping centres as is Father Christmas, Remembrance Day parades of old war veterans banned for all sorts of petty spiteful reasons, that seem calculated to deliberately upset the British, as if to say, ‘We are in charge now and you will do as we say!’ Vicars have been arrested for complaining about sex on TV or homosexuality being pushed in schools, pensioners arrested or threatened for the same thing, even children for calling fellow pupils ‘Gay’!

One girl was even imprisoned in a dirty cell for six hours because she objected to having to attend a class with asylum seeker pupils who did not speak English, the lesson being carried out in Urdu, and believe me there are thousands of examples daily that are never reported in the tame media, especially the BBC.



As Peter Hitchins of the Daily Mail believes, this country and its people are under attack, the aim of which is to destroy this country through a program of deconstruction while introducing an entirely new State at the same time. That State is the Marxist-Leninist EU! And believe me the perpetrators have almost succeeded in achieving something that 1.25,000,000 Britons have died defending us from, namely a German-French controlled Continental Reich that could not be achieved through massed tank formations and Blitzkrieg. We are in fact now about to become an occupied county without a shot being fired if we cannot remove this rotten Government through dissolution or a quick Election called through a vote of no confidence in the Commons. I also happen to believe that should this not come about, there will be no more elections, worthy of the name.



We are already a Police State and just because those powers are being sparingly used at present, it will not be long before they are fully used. The current regime is probably a little reluctant at present to use them to the full to repress dissent but they have the authority already to hand to do so. Perhaps that is one reason they have not built gulags yet but do remember under the Reform Treaty and other EU legislation, individuals, even populations can be removed wholesale to another location. The CIA were using detention camps in Poland recently.



England no longer exists as a state, even if illegally. The English people as far as I can now fathom are simply citizens of the EU regions. In effect we may actually be stateless. A common ploy of the Left is to act then pass legislation after the fact, in order to ‘legalise’ a situation. This retrospective law was heavily criticised by Lord Denning, the former Master of the Rolls who stated it was bad law.



On the other hand though, the current incumbents of New Labour may find themselves charged with treason for the very act of legislating, that crime out of British Law, since Treason stems from legislation by King Alfred and King Eathelred and subsequently passed into Statute by Edward III in 1352. Statute Law is inferior to Common Law as is Parliament itself.



The Monarch herself is not above the Law but actually the representative of the British people and their protection under Common Law. Without Common Law, England would not exist, nor would the Church of England. Magna Carta and various other legislation have reaffirmed these facts more than three times to my knowledge, the last major occasion being in 1701. Indeed a country called England cannot be abolished on the whim of a European Union or New Labour Government Act of Spite. A country is a self existing truth and like a company has a real legal personality in law. The abolition of Britain may be a de facto situation but in doing so the politicians have denied the Monarch, her heirs, and the British People their sovereignty and rightful realm. That is in fact the most heinous form of treason: the penalty for which is death.



The Briton like the Roman citizen was far more conscious of his citizen or rather subject status than any other nation that has ever existed. Liberty is the watchword of both, especially in the face of abuse by the powerful and despotic. The Common Law of England is in fact the only true survivor of Roman republican Law. Continental Napoleonic ‘codes’ stem from the time of the despot Justinian who codified the law, as all tyrants like to do!



The Roman State like the British, served the Roman People. The very emblem of Rome SPQR carried everywhere with pride wherever its legions marched was no idle boast, but like the British constitution enacted through statute, based upon Common Law represented like the British Crown, the democratic liberty and hope of an entire People. Let us hope that a Brutus or better still an Arthur is ready and waiting in the wings for the cries of a dispossessed and oppressed British race!


The BNP maybe about to have its day! They are ruthless enough to deal with those now in power! God what a frightful mess!

I WOULD GO FURTHER. THE BNP IS THE ONLY PARTY CAPABLE OF SORTING OUT THE UNHOLY MESS THE POLITICIANS OVER 4 DECADES HAVE CREATED WITH THEIR NEO MARXIST RULES AND THE MULITICULTURAL HELLHOLE THAT THE THREE PARTIES HAVE THRUST ONTO THE BRITISH PEOPLE
AGAINST THEIR WISHES!